COVID-19 Pandemic Recognized as Consideration in Assessing Reasonable Notice Period in Ontario

Lamb

The Ontario Court of Appeal (“ONCA“) recently considered a termination claim in Pavlov v. The New Zealand and Australian Lamb Company Limited 2022 ONCA 655. Prior to the decision in this case, Ontario courts have, from time to time, considered the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on reasonable notice at common law. In most cases this has resulted in increased notice periods for employees who were terminated during the pandemic. The ONCA has now approved this approach.

Background and Lower Court

The employee in this case was terminated by the employer after three years of employment. At the time of his termination, the employee was 47 years old and was the employer’s Director of Marketing Communications and Public Relations. His salary was around $130,000.00, plus a variable bonus.

Following his termination, the employee applied for over 100 positions, but was unsuccessful. By the date of the trial, he was still unemployed.

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice reviewed the circumstances of the termination and noted that at the time of the termination, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic was such that shipping and distribution industries were disrupted. These industries were relevant to the employee’s employment. The overall disruptions to industry must have been additional obstacles to the employee finding reemployment, and was a factor likely known to the employer at the time of termination.

While the employer argued for a notice period of 3 to 5 months, the court disagreed and awarded 10 months’ notice. The court noted that it considered the prevailing economic uncertainties that had an impact on the employee’s ability to secure alternative employment.

The employer appealed the decision to the Court of Appeal.

Court of Appeal Decision

The Court of Appeal chose not to interfere with the trial judge’s decision. The ONCA found that the trial judge’s decision was entitled to deference. There was no error in the trial judge’s analysis and therefore the decision was upheld. The Court of Appeal ordered additional costs against the employer as a result of the appeal.

Takeaways for Employers

Many pandemic-related terminations are currently working their way through the Ontario court system. The ONCA has now provided clarity that the impact of the pandemic can be considered by lower courts and will usually result in an increased notice period to an employee.

The fact that the pandemic is an ongoing part of life means that employers need to take care when making termination decisions. If they are in an industry that is still subject to pandemic-related disruption (and indeed disruption from other external sources), this should be considered when making a severance decision. If an employee will likely have a harder time finding alternative work following termination due to such disruptions, employers in such circumstances may be on the hook for higher notice entitlements.

At Bridge Legal & HR Solutions, we provide expertise for employers of all sizes. Call us today at (647) 794-5442 for all your employment law and workplace investigation needs.

Latest Posts

HR Insights

Free Webinar: Employment Law Year in Review on February 19, 2026

Bridge Legal & HR Solutions is pleased to present the next webinar for our clients and guests to be held of February 19, 2026, at 1pm Eastern Time. The topic for this webinar will be a review of Ontario employment law updates from 2025 and how to ensure your business is compliant coming into 2026. Register Today!

Read More »
employee sitting in front of a laptop with head low and hands on forehead

Simplifying HR Through Outsourcing

Managing a business means juggling everything from strategy and sales to operations, including product development, delivery, support and finance.  HR is often not treated as a function they plan for and manage proactively. That’s where HR outsourcing can step in, helping turn day-to-day HR headaches into a proactive strategy that supports the business instead of distracting from it.

Read More »

Navigating the Presence of a Third Party in Workplace Investigation Interviews

One of the most common and challenging scenarios for HR professionals and workplace investigators is when a participant asks to have another person present during an interview. For those conducting investigations, handling the presence of a third party requires a careful balance between procedural fairness, compliance with law and applicable policies, and the integrity of the investigation itself. This blog explores how to navigate these situations effectively, including how to manage an overzealous advocate, what to do if the support person turns out to be a witness, and what the proper role of a third party should be.

Read More »